TCC-Originated Changes to the GP’s Strategic
Framework Element
Principles for Interpreting the
General Plan
A Community Bill of Rights
The policies of the City of
City of
Policies
SF-1 The General Plan shall not be used as a
means to compel a community to accept a reduced quality of life, or a
significant change to its essential character.
Passed in May by
CPC by a vote of 25-3-1 (the CPC chair routinely abstains from voting).
SF-2 The General Plan shall not be construed as
encouraging or recommending a growth in city spending.
This will be voted
by CPC on June 26th.
SF-3 The General Plan shall not be construed as
encouraging growth in the size or scope of government.
Passed in May by
CPC by a vote of 20-8-1
SF-4 The General Plan shall not be used as encouraging
excessive additional administrative impediments that serve to increase the cost
of development.
Failed at CPC by a vote of 13-15-1
TCC-Originated
Changes to the GP’s Mobility Element
Added a new Goal to Section C on page ME-20:
♦ Well maintained streets and a responsive
road-repair program.
Changed
the sub-header at the top of page ME-21 to read:
Street Layout, Design, Operations and Maintenance
Added
a new Discussion item to the bottom of page ME-21 that reads:
A top priority is proper street
maintenance: filling potholes, repaving damaged streets and fixing raised
sidewalks. Maintenance of the road system is a critical City function with high
visibility because poorly maintained streets: 1) can cause vehicle damage, 2)
can cause vehicle and pedestrian accidents, and 3) tend to accelerate further
deterioration of the roadway. Service-level metrics should be established to
assess the City’s ability to maintain the roadways and its responsiveness to
citizen complaints.
Passed in June
by CPC by a vote of 19-0-1
Significantly amended policy ME-C.4
sub-policy b to read:
b. Establish street maintenance
as a priority city service that adequately maintains the transportation system.
1) Establish minimum Levels of Service for road
repair (repaving, sealing, pot hole filling, curb and sidewalk repair, etc.) to
ensure priority repairs are made without delay and less critical repairs are
made in reasonable time.
2) Ensure that road repair concerns of lower
priority are consolidated into efficient work packages such that repair crews
in the field: a) fix all reported issues in the nearby area and b) unreported
but equally significant road repair issues also are fixed by a repair crew in
the area.
3) Establish road repair Levels of Service that
can be measured and tracked over time to verify city response times. City shall
report regularly to the public on its ability to satisfy the minimum Levels of
Service for street maintenance.
4) Establish lines of communication between City
staff and the Communities (via the CPGs) to facilitate the reporting and
prioritization of a community’s more significant road repair concerns. Automate
via the internet an information exchange with communities in order to
facilitate the widest understanding of the status of road repair and other
intended changes to street design.
Passed in June
by CPC by a vote of 19-0-1
Amended the discussion of Airport Site
Selection in Section H, page ME-43, to read:
In recognition of
long-term capacity constraints at SDIA, the San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority is searching for a new airport site to address regional air
transportation needs. Even upon selection, it could take up to fifteen years
before a new international airport could begin flight operations. Depending
upon the selected location, the City will coordinate land use and
transportation planning decisions with the Airport Authority to serve the new
airport. In the interim, the City will coordinate
with the
Passed in June
by CPC by a vote of 16-1-2
Failed
to amend the Goals of Section B, page ME-16:
♦ A
transit system that pays for itself.
Failed at CPC by a vote of 4-15-1